Progress | Centre-left Labour politics

Championing shared values for peace

Over a year since the first protests of the Arab Spring, and with so much hope, uncertainty and pain continuing to be felt across the Middle East, it is right that Labour is at the centre of efforts to promote the spread of democracy and respect for human rights in the region. Yesterday’s parliamentary debate on Israel and the peace process, led by Labour Friends of Israel chair John Woodcock MP, was a timely opportunity to voice support for those seeking peace and greater freedoms, and to scrutinise the government’s work, to ensure that its policies both bolster those seeking a negotiated two-state solution to the Middle East conflict, and strengthen and deepen relations with Israel, still the only full participatory democracy in the region.

As the late David Cairns MP expressed last year: ‘We will never find a just and lasting agreement [in the Middle East] if we forget or overlook the fact that Israel is the only regional exemplar, not just of democracy, but of social democracy. Its values are rooted in left-of-centre principles.’ This goes to the heart of what was expressed in parliament yesterday, and was set out by John Woodcock in an article ahead of the debate.

When Labour supports change in the Middle East; when we sought the protection of civilians in Libya; when we back tough sanctions and Security Council action against the Syrian regime; and when we highlight Iran’s appalling human rights record and its illegal nuclear programme – it is right that our values guide us, and it is also right that our values guide us to support strong and deep bilateral relations with Israel, and a negotiated two-state solution to the Middle East conflict.

With the Middle East peace process stalled, and Israeli and Palestinian leaders, regrettably, not meeting across the negotiating table, we should be loudly calling on the government, together with its international partners, to set out a plan for aiding a return to talks. The current situation is dangerous, and has led to the questioning of a negotiated two-state solution. However, whilst negotiation and compromise will be painful for both Israelis and Palestinians, there is no shortcut to making and agreeing difficult choices necessary for achieving conflict resolution and meeting the aspirations of both peoples. A negotiated two-state solution is the only way for the Palestinians to achieve their right to self-determination, and it is the only way Israel can be safeguarded and preserved as the homeland of the Jewish people.

Given the dangers of pessimism, it is in all of our interests to urge the government to push for a resumption of talks, as rightly called for by the Middle East Quartet. To get back to talks, we should both learn from the failures of previous attempts at peace, but also look back on the offers made and the understandings achieved, to build confidence that a negotiated solution is both possible and the only peaceful way forward. And we should also work together to challenge the Iranian regime and the peace spoilers it sponsors, to ensure that the Israeli and Palestinian people have the best chance of finding a lasting peace.

Confidently putting our values at the centre of our concerns means that we should not shy away from allying ourselves with those in the region who share those values, and challenging those who do not. Iran, Hamas and their allies who oppose peace, oppose Israel and oppose a two-state solution, do not only oppose our foreign policies, but also our way of life, and we should make this clear. Similarly, we should make clear that our bilateral relations with Palestinian moderates, and our support for the Palestinian economy, institution building and improvements to freedom of movement, are central to our support for peace and human rights.

As was expressed yesterday, we must also assert that our relations with Israel, our political, economic, educational, cultural and scientific bonds, are not only to be treasured for the considerable mutual benefits they bring, but also because they are born from, and are expressions of, our shared values – our support for democracy and equal rights. Israel lives out these values every day and, just as we do in Britain, progressives in Israel are working to push further and to achieve more.

The louder and more forcefully we champion our shared values, the greater success we will achieve as we work together for our mutual goals of prosperity, equality, security and peace.

—————————————————————————————

Ben Garratt is the deputy director of Labour Friends of Israel which tweets @_LFI

—————————————————————————————

Photo: woodleywonderworks

Progressive centre-ground Labour politics does not come for free.

It takes time, commitment and money to build a fight against the forces of conservatism. If you value the work Progress does, please support us by becoming a member, subscriber or donating.

Our work depends on you.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Ben Garratt

is a member of Progress and former deputy director of Labour Friends of Israel

1 comment

  • The progressive values at the core of the state of Israel raised in this article are pertinent and important, and describe the reasons why many of us on the centre-left support Israel and it’s thriving, dynamic democracy. Having attended the Westminster hall debate mentioned, I was left with the feeling that it’s incredibly important that Labour (members, activists and MPs) accentuate the areas where we agree on Israel, Palestine and the peace process. Such debates are important and timely, and offer an ideal opportunity for our MPs to reach consensus on a range of fundamental issues relating to the peace process. For example, Anne McGuire MP raised the Israeli Supreme Court ruling for the dismantling of the Migron illegal settlement, a really positive ruling that all sections of the Labour party should celebrate. We all need to be vocal in our support for these sort of advances, just as we all need to be vocal in condemning the human rights abuses of Iran, Syria and Hamas. There is nothing progressive about supporting tyrants that systematically oppress political opponents, trade unions, the LGBT community, and ethnic or religious minorities.

    Rather than constantly requesting that advocates for Israel speak negatively of the Israeli state or government, why don’t we move away from attacking (Israel and each other), and find things we can agree on, in the name of peace? Let’s join in our support for the sterling work Palestinian Prime Minister Salam Fayyad has carried out towards state building, and the fantastic work Israeli President Shimon Peres does in reaching out to all sectors of Israeli society. When the Israeli Supreme Court rules against illegal settlements, lets vocally support those rulings, and hope the independence of the judiciary will continue to make important decisions and provide justice for Israelis and Palestinians. And as Ben says, lets get back to peace talks- it’s the only way to get a two state solution with two people living side-by-side in peace and prosperity.

Sign up to our daily roundup email

int(0)