The modernisers’ manifesto

Conservatives still lack a strategy for the future

John Stuart Mill once described the Tories as ‘the stupid party’. On the evidence of The Modernisers’ Manifesto, published last month by Bright Blue, a self-described pressure group for liberal conservatism, the party is not dead from the neck upwards. However, the ‘modernisers’ have some way to go in reclaiming a position of intellectual ascendency. Moreover, there are ideological fissures within modern Conservatism which appear irresolvable.

The manifesto is portrayed as merely the next instalment of a pragmatic Tory tradition in the mould of Harold Macmillan and RA Butler, espousing competence and social order rather than rigid ideology. Matthew D’Ancona vividly describes the contaminating impact of the new right’s ideological doctrine on the electability of the contemporary Conservative party.

As such, there is serious thinking going on here, but firmly cast within a technocratic ‘what works’ mindset that avoids issues of ideological controversy. Members of parliament such as George Freeman and Laura Sandys address the goal of an innovation-led economy going beyond conventional measures of GDP. The Tory modernisers are determined not to cede the battleground of public services to the left. There is wide-ranging analysis of the challenges facing the NHS, schools and higher education. The environment, poverty, drugs policy, global security, and gender equality feature too.

Nonetheless, the absence of ideological self-questioning only serves to underline how deep run the battlelines in a party which is still to come to terms with its Thatcherite legacy. On the question of the size of the state, there is little sense of what the strategic objective of a future Tory government would be. In the past, Conservative politicians talked openly of a ‘35 per cent state’, a position incompatible with modernisers’ support for a taxpayer-funded NHS.

Margaret Thatcher’s assertion that high levels of public expenditure were at the heart of Britain’s relative economic decline has been buried. But what replaces it? The question of whether Conservatives should accept public spending commitments that match the northern European average is side-stepped, while the modernisers appear similarly reluctant to address future taxation. The most politically contentious issue of all for the right, Britain’s relationship with continental Europe, is left to an academic to disentangle.

The Tories have lost the will to self-destruction that led to three consecutive defeats after 1997, but the party lacks a compelling project for the country anchored in a strategic vision. Regaining intellectual self-confidence and moving beyond Thatcherism, developing a unifying political purpose, appears some way off.

———————————

Patrick Diamond is lecturer in public policy at Queen Mary University of London

———————————

The Modernisers’ Manifesto

Edited by Ryan Shorthouse, Kate Malby and James Brenton

Bright Blue Campaign | 192pp

Progressive centre-ground Labour politics does not come for free.

It takes time, commitment and money to build a fight against the forces of conservatism. If you value the work Progress does, please support us by becoming a member, subscriber or donating.

Our work depends on you.

Print Friendly

, ,

Comments: 1...

  1. On January 28, 2015 at 11:16 pm Jonathan Timbers responded with... #

    This is an interesting article with some sharp insights, but it doesn’t really explain why this manifesto is unconvincing, or why the Toryism is dying.
    My rather simplistic take on this is that neo-liberalism is more dominant in the Conservative party than Burkeian Toryism, which is where I think Cameron and Hague would like to be.
    The Tories are neither conservative these days (after all they’re in the process of privatising English Heritage) or unionist (their statements about Scottish MPs voting rights are very divisive). So they are in danger of losing their political narrative.

Add your response