Progress | Centre-left Labour politics

Nasty tactics in EU referendum race

Some nasty tactics have already appeared in the European Union referendum campaign.

One is the way that anti-EU campaigners try to bully or discredit their opponents, rather than discuss the issues. Their response to any message they do not like is to threaten, dismiss or try to silence the messenger – whether that be businesses, universities, charities, the BBC, trade unions or even the government. If an organisation points out how EU membership benefits its area of work, it is immediately labelled as being in the pay of ‘Brussels’. Anyone who raises concerns about the possible consequences of leaving is labelled a scaremonger. If a government leaflet puts forward arguments to remain, they condemn the cost of the leaflet and demand it be scrapped, rather than engage with the arguments. And so on.

Pro-Europeans must, of course, continue to make the positive case for our EU membership. There is plenty to talk about: jobs, prosperity, peace, democracy, security, cooperation among neighbours. But equally, we must not be bullied away from spelling out ways in which leaving the EU would be a catastrophe. There is indeed much to be fearful about: not so much Project Fear as Project Reality.

Of course, we have always had to contend with the fact-free, anti-European bias of many of Britain’s dominant newspapers. That bias is now openly flaunted by the likes of the Mail and the Express, with their increasingly shrill headlines and rarely even a gesture towards balanced journalism. But the nature of media reporting on the referendum campaign so far has also highlighted a couple of more subtle problems.

First, most reporting in recent weeks – even by the more sensible broadcast media – has been focused on the battle of personalities between the two sides of the Tory civil war over Europe. When the governing party is so dramatically split, I can sympathise with the desire to watch, for some with glee. But this is a vital debate about the future of our country, not something that should be reduced to a political spectator sport. Besides, the relentless focus on Conservative divisions is in danger of drowning out the overwhelmingly positive positions of Labour, the Liberal Democrats, the Greens, the Scottish National party and Plaid Cymru – not to mention the many non-political voices from trade unions to universities to businesses.

Along the same lines, the BBC seems to have decided that the requirements of balance are satisfied by pairing every pro-EU business with an anti-EU one, every pro-EU Labour spokesperson with an anti-EU one, and so on. But when a particular cohort overwhelmingly favours one side over the other – as is the case with both the Labour party and British businesses – it is actually misleading to present the two sides as if they were evenly split.

A similar problem arises from the BBC’s increasing tendency to pair every claim with a counter-claim, making no effort to analyse which claim is better supported by evidence. This leaves well-meaning viewers baffled about which side to believe, even on fairly straightforward factual matters like the amount of money we spend at European level.

So are there any positives at this stage? One or two. The most obvious is the fact that most polls have consistently shown a modest lead for Remain – though it is still too close to call.

Another is the fact that, despite everything, the Brexit campaign has not actually made much of the running over the past couple of months. Its internal divisions are one reason for this. It has been several fragmented groups, each previously focused on trying to win the Electoral Commission’s blessing and the funding that comes with it.

But the bigger reason is that, even though they try to downplay it, there is a huge contradiction at the heart of the Brexit argument about what they actually want.

Some of them say that we should leave the EU but remain a partial member of the EU single market. We would then be like Norway – still able to export most goods to Europe tariff-free, but in return following all the EU’s rules and contributing to its shared budget, while giving up our power to shape those rules and decide how the money is spent.

Others among them, realising that that is not a very attractive option, glibly say we should sever ourselves entirely from Europe and ‘go global’. But we would then have to try to make up for losing our tariff-free access to our main export market, by going cap in hand to other countries around the world, pleading for trade deals that are somehow better than the ones we have already negotiated through our EU membership, with the clout of the world’s largest market behind us.

The problem is not just that these alternatives are flatly contradictory – it is that neither is remotely realistic. No wonder they want to keep off the facts and attack their opponents instead!

———————————–

Richard Corbett MEP is deputy leader of the British Labour members of the European parliament. He tweets @RCorbettMEP

———————————–

Join Richard at Best of Britain: How does Labour effectively make the case for staying in Europe? in Leeds. And don’t forget too to check out Richard’s Doorstep EU app for the latest, authoritative analysis

Ahead of the EU referendum, on the 28 April Progress and Labour Movement for Europe are pleased to invite you to a special training event followed by a panel discussion in Leeds to help activists make the best case on the doorstep for staying in Europe.

Activist training: How (not) to talk about Europe
6-7pm, Thursday 28 April 2016
Lecture Theatre D, The Rose Bowl, Portland Crescent, Leeds, LS1 3HB

Kevin Peel Member, European Union committee of regions

Based on the research by British Future this training will help equip activists with the skills to best convince the public about why it is so important to stay in the European Union. The training is free for all Progress and LME members and is just £5 for all other Labour members.

Best of Britain: How does Labour effectively make the case for staying in Europe?
7-8.15pm, Thursday 28 April 2016
Lecture Theatre D, The Rose Bowl, Portland Crescent, Leeds, LS1 3HB

Mary Creagh MP Wakefield
Richard Corbett MEP Yorkshire and the Humber

The discussion will centre around the challenges ahead of the upcoming European referendum and how we can all play our part in ensuring Britain remains part of the European Union. All Labour members are welcome to this free event.

———————————–

Photo: European parliament

Progressive centre-ground Labour politics does not come for free.

It takes time, commitment and money to build a fight against the forces of conservatism. If you value the work Progress does, please support us by becoming a member, subscriber or donating.

Our work depends on you.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Richard Corbett MEP

is deputy leader of the British Labour members of the European parliament

7 comments

  • Having seen Kate Hoey on TV yesterday, I began to wonder whether, in the event of the hunting debate being reopened, the BBC would feel obliged to wheel her out every time an anti-hunting Labour MP was interviewed.

  • The needle’s stuck. Change the record. You’re nothing more or less than the pub bore on this site.

  • “my room mate Mary Is getting paid on the internet 98$/hr”..,……..!wc613ctwo days ago grey MacLaren P1 I bought after earning 18,512 DoIIars..it was my previous month’s payout..just a little over.17k DoIIars Last month..3-5 hours job a day…with weekly payouts..it’s realy the simplest. job I have ever Do.. I Joined This 7 months. ago. and now making over. hourly 87 DoIIars…Learn. More right Here !wc613:➽:➽:➽➽➽➽ http://GlobalSuperJobsReportsEmploymentsLifelineGetPayHourly$98…. .❖❖:❦❦:❖❖:❦❦:❖❖:❦❦:❖❖:❦❦:❖❖:❦❦:❖❖:❦❦:❖❖:❦❦:❖❖:❦❦:❖❖:❦❦:❖❖:❦❦:❖❖:❦❦::::::!wc613……..

  • There is a very sensible plan out there that would remove us from the European Union, and give us access to the EEA for the short term, and that will give us time to untie the UK/EU political and judicial spiders web:

    http://www.eureferendum.com/themarketsolution.pdf

    The Norway option, as an interim part of the plan, would see us step away from a political EU and would see us return to the global top table – where the UK can represent the UK – and this could be, with good will on all sides, a smooth and less disruptive new beginning.

    More on the Norway/EFTA escape rout here:

    https://thescepticisle.com/efta-eea/

    For those who point to the “fax democracy” meme of “pay and no say” I would ask one question – What say did the people of the United Kingdom have on the Lisbon Treaty?
    The writer of the piece above was part of, and right in the thick of, the Lisbon process – the most anti-democratic piece of political thuggery that I have experienced in my voting lifetime.

Sign up to our daily roundup email

int(0)