In defence of local campaign forums

In 2003–4 I was elected as the secretary of Newcastle local government committee. It was a profoundly depressing experience; I rapidly found that the meetings were cumbersome, bureaucratic and detached from the reality of campaigning on the ground for Labour. Month after month I would type up minutes, wondering what we had actually achieved other than have a lengthy debate about someone’s pet policy interests. I calculated that we spent more time each month in meetings in the Civic Centre than we did knocking on doors speaking to voters; I still shudder when someone asks ‘any matters arising from the minutes?’ because this part of the meeting used to last at least an hour.

I was therefore delighted that Newcastle became one of the early adopters of the local campaign forum model, where, instead of a monthly committee meeting of the same faces, we rapidly adopted a series of task-focussed meetings. Candidate selection? Let’s use the opportunity to go out and promote the party to women and BAME community groups. Writing a manifesto? Let’s engage party members in policy workshops and get them debating the real issues and challenges our city faces. Fundraising? Let’s not ‘hold a social’, let’s engage our student union and put on a comedy evening. Planning a campaign? Let’s use the expertise of our members of parliament and in our constituencies to bring the best campaigners in the city together.

And this approach had real results. We started winning council seats. In 2011 we took control of the council, and have continued to gain council seats. We increased our majorities in all three of the city’s constituencies in 2010, and again in 2015.

Around the country, LCFs have freed up the party to campaign more effectively. All this could be at risk from a rule change that has been put forward to conference by the Campaign for Labour Party Democracy. They want to see LCFs swept away, taking us back to the old local government committee system. Not only is this a regressive step, and would undermine the grassroots campaigning that has been embedded in the party over the last decade, but they want Labour Group leaders explicitly excluded from membership. Their proposal, that LCGs consist entirely of CLP and affiliated organisation delegates, would marginalise and isolate the local Labour Group from the very purpose of the party at a local level – planning and leading campaigns.

A generous interpretation of this proposal is that it reflects a dissatisfaction with change, that modernisation of party infrastructure is not necessary and that campaigns are best organised by large committees. A more cynical reading is that this is an attempt to set party members against elected Labour councillors, providing a platform from which to attack them and undermine their efforts and ensure that they are marginalised and isolated from campaigning.

Either interpretation is unacceptable. Labour councillors are, through our ALC subs, the largest single funder of the party. We keep constituencies alive, flying the flag for Labour in areas without a Labour MP. We speak to constituents regularly through advice surgeries and public meetings, and have our finger on the pulse of our local communities. To exclude us from planning our own campaigns would be as short sighted as it is counterproductive.

The introduction of LCFs was a necessary step in making the party more nimble, better joined up and ultimately better connected to our communities. Turning the clock back by abolishing them would be a colossal mistake – we must work together to ensure this proposed rule change is rejected.

———————————

Nick Forbes is leader of the Local Government Association Labour group and leader of Newcastle city council. He tweets @nick_forbes

———————————

Photo

Progressive centre-ground Labour politics does not come for free.

It takes time, commitment and money to build a fight against the forces of conservatism. If you value the work Progress does, please support us by becoming a member, subscriber or donating.

Our work depends on you.

Print Friendly

, ,

Comments: 2...

  1. On September 14, 2016 at 12:15 pm Mark Livingston responded with... #

    We need to discuss ideological direction at CLP level now that we’re a socialist party once again. The trouble with LCGs is that such debate is stifled.

    We can’t go back to the bad old days of moribund CLPs being led by Tory-lite careerists in the PLP.

  2. On June 21, 2017 at 11:11 am david llewellyn responded with... #

    The local campaign forum barrier

    The local campaign forum is now the only link with local party members and the council labour group, it is clearly not working in relation to Chapter 12 Rules for Labour Party Local Campaign Forums section 2 is the relevant section
    “To work with the Labour Group to organize opportunities for individual members, branches, trade unions, affiliated organizations and community organizations to enter into dialogue with the Labour Group on current local government policy issues and ideas for the party’s future programme and manifesto.”
    It ended the role of the county party and replaced it with a local campaign form and effectively ended any accountability of councillors
    How many members know what it does, what it has been doing, who is on it, how to contact it, find the website, ,does little ,very difficult to contact ,members of it are invisible, few party members know what it does , few party members know who runs it, few party members know what it has campaigned on, few party members know how to contact it, in fact this is a barrier between Councilors ,the Labour council and ordinary party members when policies and actions of the council should be open to members to discuss and debate especially if labour councillors do not attend meetings or send members information
    Steps towards democracy and accountability in the labour party at a local level have not happened so
    1. councillor contracts should be compulsory
    2 councillor attendance at ward meetings should be part of contract (if they do not attend where is the democracy and accountability)
    3 End local campaign forums and return to local party structure in council areas, ,enables labour councillors and labour run councils to avoid democracy and accountability from party members because only the campaign forum is the link between members and labour run councils
    4 the chair of the forum should be a non councillor
    5 the Group leadership to report to the wider membership and answer for progress of implementation of the election manifesto and current and future council policies”
    Please think about this issue
    Mr Llewellyn from county Durham, party member since1981 and district councillor 1987 to 2009

Add your response