Class warfare never helped anyone

John McDonnell’s suggestion that those earning £70,000 per year are ‘rich’ is the kind of policy that alienates voters from all economic backgrounds, argues Dom Anderson

Back in January I wrote this piece setting out why Labour could not risk turning itself into a party that punishes success and penalises aspiration. Everything I wrote then the still stands and sadly has become even more pertinent as we head into a snap general election.

With the Tories firmly entrenching themselves in traditional working class communities it has become even more urgent that Labour is a party for all people. it is no coincidence that Theresa May decided to launch her party’s general election campaign in Bolton in the heart of Lancashire. The Conservatives will be marketing themselves as the party of aspiration – wanting to form a government for those that dream of success against an opposition hell-bent on ideological class war.

John McDonnell suggesting that someone earning £70,000 a year is rich and as such should be taxed accordingly is exactly the kind of policy that alienates voters from all economic backgrounds. When I look at my own friendship group, I have mates who are plumbers and tradespeople who work every hour that God sends. If the right jobs come in and they graft hard enough they might earn around the figure that McDonnell has suggested would make them rich. What message are we sending to them about their hard work? Why would they vote for a party that sees their hard work as a chance to penalise? Equally it is worth noting that some people also work extremely hard and struggle to make ends meet, this is not because of their slightly better paid neighbours or friends, this is because we have a government that will not tackle the cost of living and its implications.

The McDonnell narrative is especially dangerous because of the impact it has on the very people we in Labour have always considered our core vote. Modern Britain is different from that of our grandparents. Working people are better informed, they do not see class as a barrier any more. The majority of parents in C2 and DE households – among which the Tories have an 18 point lead – want their children to grow up in a society where social mobility is high. People who work extremely hard in low paid work do so often to provide for families in the hope of them going on to achieve a better employment outcome than they did. As the first man in my direct family to go to university, I know I go to work because I want a home environment for my daughter where she can flourish and achieve her goals.

Then we come to home ownership. My grandparents bought the home they lived in until they died from our local council, it was not a right to buy property but instead was built by the council for council tenants wanting to own their own home. My parents’ generation benefited from much cheaper mortgages and could own their own homes on most working incomes. My generation however are stuck at the mercy of the rented sector. Obviously, there is a need for the private rental sector but I can tell you as a renter myself that many my age would love to be out of it. My generation have dreams and aspirations and we want a government that understands them.

Making announcements about ‘taxing the rich’ and then defining rich as anyone over £70,000 may feel comfortable in small branch meetings and some factional groupings within the party but they do very serious damage to our party in the eyes and hearts of the very people we need to vote for us. John Smith said in his last speech in 1994 ‘A chance to serve, that is all we ask’. We ask the British public for that same honour today, but no party can represent only the interests of those it is most comfortable with and expect to be handed power.

––––––––––––

Dom Anderson is a Labour councillor. He tweets at @DomAnderson87

––––––––––––

Photo

Progressive centre-ground Labour politics does not come for free.

It takes time, commitment and money to build a fight against the forces of conservatism. If you value the work Progress does, please support us by becoming a member, subscriber or donating.

Our work depends on you.

Print Friendly

, , , , ,

Comments: 2...

  1. On April 20, 2017 at 9:45 pm Verity responded with... #

    Should someone not inform this contributor that there is a general election on?

    What can he possibly want to achieve by attacking his own Party in public at this time even if he has been doing so for the last two years?

    So many Tories wanted to stay in the EU. Did they spend all their verbal energy attacking their Party when it selected to oppose EU membership? Some basic lessons in how to conduct yourself in office would be welcome contribution for so many public Labour figures who abuse their selections for office.

    • On April 21, 2017 at 3:14 pm John responded with... #

      So the excuse for the impending defeat will be “its the red tories wot did it”. Not incoherent poorly developed policies such as soak those who earn over £70,000 such as plumbers,GP,s Headteachers and Police Inspectors.

      Once on the doorstep and are bombarded by “I cannot vote Labour whilst Corbyn is leader”. Some may get the message.

      Still thanks to May,s panic and calling the election 2 years early that is 2 years less Tory government.

      1931 to 1945 14 years

      1951 to 1964 13 years

      1983 to 1997 14 years

      So next Labour Government will be 2030/31 rather than 2033/34.

Add your response